By:
Garrett Olexa
Defining Mental Capacity and How it Impacts Your Ability to Conduct Business, Manage Your Estate, and Even Vote.
According to recent statistics, the U.S.
population aged 65 and older is projected to nearly double over the next three
decades. This year, baby boomers are between the ages of 52 and 70 and, as this
large segment of the population ages, there has been an increase in the number
of people suffering from dementia, Alzheimer’s, and other memory diseases.
According to the Alzheimer’s Association, more than 5 million Americans are
currently living with the disease, and 1 in 3 seniors dies with Alzheimer’s or
another form of dementia. This raises questions regarding the ability of those
challenged with cognitive deficiencies and disabilities to enter into
contracts, sign releases, transfer deeds to land, create valid Wills and
binding powers of attorney, or even to vote.
Depending
on the person’s condition, he or she may be considered mentally competent for
some purposes, but incompetent for others. The factors for what constitute
sufficient mental capacity to ensure validity and enforceability varies
depending on the circumstance and type of document being executed. For instance, in Arizona, with respect to the
issue of competency to execute and be bound by a contractual document, such as
a liability release, the standard is whether, under all circumstances, a person’s
mental abilities have been so affected as to render him or her incapable of
understanding the nature and consequences of his or her acts. Was he or she unable
to understand the character of the transaction in question? The ability to validly transfer a deed
employs a similar standard. The determination of competency of the person
transferring the property depends upon whether he or she could understand and
appreciate the nature of conveyance executed.
When
it comes to creating a valid Will or Trust, testamentary capacity is an
essential element. Specifically, the person signing the Will or Trust must understand
the nature of his or her act and the nature or character of his or her property.
In Arizona, a person is incapacitated and cannot create a valid Will or Trust
if he is “. . . impaired by reason of mental illness, mental deficiency, mental
disorder, physical illness or disability, chronic use of drugs, chronic
intoxication or other cause, except minority, to the extent that he lacks
sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible
decisions concerning his person.”
The
Arizona courts have applied a slightly different test when it comes to the
creation of a power of attorney. A power of attorney is a document that allows
one person (the “principal”) to give the power for making decisions and
performing certain actions to another person (the “attorney-in-fact”) on the
principal’s behalf. A power of attorney may provide the attorney-in-fact the
authority to enter into financial transactions, sell real estate, handle
business transactions, and even make health care decisions. The test to determine the competency of an individual to execute
power of attorney is whether the person is capable of understanding, in a
reasonable manner, the nature and effect of his act. In order to challenge
the validity of a power of attorney, it must be shown that mental incompetency
existed at the time the document was signed; therefore, the power of attorney
is not necessarily invalid if someone becomes incompetent after signing the
document.
Mental
capacity can also determine a person’s ability to vote. In Arizona, a person
placed under limited guardianship will automatically have his or her right to
vote revoked and will have to petition the court to request that it be
reinstated by providing clear and convincing evidence regarding capacity. In
other words, the petitioner will need to prove he or she has retained a
sufficient understanding in order to retain the right to vote.
Of
course, a person’s mental capacity can be compromised not only by advanced age,
but unexpectedly as a result of trauma or disease. Thus, delaying to prepare
critical estate planning documents for which validity turns, in part, on the
signer’s mental competency can prove costly–financially and to an individual’s
quality of life.
___________________________________________________________________
Garrett Olexa is a Member with the law firm of Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, PLC and works in its estate planning practice group. He can be contacted at golexa@jsslaw.com or 623.878.2222.
No comments:
Post a Comment